NEO Miscues

Find a model with an issue? Post your findings here.
User avatar
JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 38986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 » Thu May 30, 2013 6:48 am

At least they tried :lol:
Jeff
ImageImage

User avatar
cadillaclloyd
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 1:41 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

NEO Cadillac Issue

Post by cadillaclloyd » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:40 pm

These models appear to have been in a roll-over crash. It is a shame the manufacturer can't get it correct.

Image

User avatar
JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 38986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 6:35 am

NEO can be very frustrating.
Jeff
ImageImage

User avatar
cadillaclloyd
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 1:41 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by cadillaclloyd » Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:41 pm

Thanks for moving this..,I saw the thread too late.

Yes, they can be. What amazes me are the number of folks on another board who have so many excuses for NEO, and seem to tolerate the many issues that appear. I don't buy models that appear to have been crushed.

It is one thing to remove an emblem to make a model a correct version, but there is not much you can do with this.

L

User avatar
sheepCrusher
Posts: 5474
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by sheepCrusher » Tue Jun 25, 2013 7:36 pm

They'd be more forgivable at IXO prices.
The dog wet on the picnic basket
Image

TR2
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:40 am

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by TR2 » Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:48 am

They need to s l o w down. :|

User avatar
sheepCrusher
Posts: 5474
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by sheepCrusher » Fri Jul 05, 2013 2:01 am

For anyone thinking of buying an Imperator it looks like, from searching online, that there is only a white version with the word "Imperator" on the side. It would appear that the great version is a fantasy model. I am often wrong though.

Image
The dog wet on the picnic basket
Image

Johnny_Bravo
Posts: 3922
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:54 am
Location: bucharest romania
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Johnny_Bravo » Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:17 am

if the color is the only wrong thing about it i am pretty happy, cause i got one coming. anything about the tycoon? i have one too on the road.

User avatar
sheepCrusher
Posts: 5474
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by sheepCrusher » Fri Jul 05, 2013 2:19 pm

What's wrong with the color?
The dog wet on the picnic basket
Image

Johnny_Bravo
Posts: 3922
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:54 am
Location: bucharest romania
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Johnny_Bravo » Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:27 pm

apparently it never came in grey with the IMPERATOR writing on the doors.

User avatar
sheepCrusher
Posts: 5474
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by sheepCrusher » Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:47 pm

I have seen it in grey, just no decal.
The dog wet on the picnic basket
Image

GBOAC002
Posts: 7466
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:33 pm
Location: Surrey, UK.

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by GBOAC002 » Sat Jul 06, 2013 4:27 am

The body kit doesn't do it any favours in my opinion. Bentley have done a better job on their GT3.

AdamYip
Posts: 712
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 6:02 am

Re: NEO Cadillac Issue

Post by AdamYip » Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:38 am

cadillaclloyd wrote:These models appear to have been in a roll-over crash. It is a shame the manufacturer can't get it correct.

Image
The brown one I got seems to be OK.

Image

Image

Image


Don't know what happened to the beige one, even the one appearing on the website seems to be in a roll-over crash.

Cheers,
Adam

User avatar
cadillaclloyd
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 1:41 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by cadillaclloyd » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:11 pm

Yes, yours looks much better!

User avatar
JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 38986
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 » Sat Jul 20, 2013 7:05 am

I still see the slope to the roof :|
Jeff
ImageImage

User avatar
IFHP
Posts: 1076
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:25 am
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by IFHP » Fri Aug 16, 2013 2:02 am

Neo's new G93A Ford Taunus is very attractive, but sadly it is inaccurate in some of its details.

Image
G93A Taunus by Neo by IFHP97, on Flickr

Image
1939 Ford Taunus (Germany) p3 by IFHP97, on Flickr

The actual 1939-41 G93A Taunus had body color wheel covers, more chrome trim and "Ford Taunus" script on its nose.

Image
1948 Ford Taunus (Germany) by IFHP97, on Flickr

For comparison, here is a 1948-50 G73A Taunus. It does have the bright wheel covers, the non Limited 300 version of this models doesn't have the bright inlays in the grille so might be closer to a G73A than a G93A. There was "Spezial" version of the G73A which had bright inlays in the grille, but also had turn signals on top of the front fenders.
Collector of 1:43 Scale Fords

ImageHighway Scene by Michael, on Flickr

User avatar
mikeC
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:04 pm
Location: Sherwood Forest

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by mikeC » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:07 am

NEO have just introduced the Triumph Vitesse; They seem to have done a fair job of the model, although the front sidelights are the wrong proportions and in the wrong place:

Image

But they don't seem to know what they have modelled! They call it a 1969 Triumph Vitesse 6; it seems to be a reasonable rendition of a 1962-65 Vitesse 6, or a lousy rendition of a 1969 Vitesse 2-litre Mark 2... and then they put a 1979 Registration Number on it! And the colour schemes are a poor choice, too. The Conifer Green is fine for an early car, but the interior should be Cactus (pale green), or Matador Red if it's trying to be a 1966-68 2-litre Mark 1; the Black interior would be fine for a 1969 car, but then it's the wrong exterior shade of Green! The red looks to be more like Vermilion, which is wrong for all versions of the Vitesse, but that may be just the photography; assuming it's the correct Signal Red, then again the interiors are a bit adrift: either Matador Red for the Vitesse 6, or the Black is OK for either of the later 2-litre models.

Oh dear, just a little more care needed...
Mike

User avatar
David MG
Posts: 14476
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 8:27 am
Location: North Wales - UK

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by David MG » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:18 am

The red one is on the list for a reduced price one. Definitely going to put wires on it.
Model manufactures just cannot get Brit. stalwarts right.
Cheers,
David

User avatar
IFHP
Posts: 1076
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:25 am
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by IFHP » Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:34 am

Per the Triumph discussion, here are a couple of period ads:

Image1963 Triumph Sport 6 Convertible (USA) by IFHP97, on Flickr
1963

Image1969 Triumph Vitesse Mk 2 (UK) by IFHP97, on Flickr
1969
Collector of 1:43 Scale Fords

ImageHighway Scene by Michael, on Flickr

User avatar
Baxter
Posts: 601
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:05 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Baxter » Fri Apr 24, 2015 10:43 pm

Another Neo color flaw. They have recently released a 1953 Corvette but the 1953 was only available in white with a red interior and black top. Black, red & blue were introduced in 1954 but the photos of this model show a more purple-ish hue than the real car. Also, all blue cars in 1954 had beige interiors & roofs and the model photo looks like it has a blue or a black interior with a blue top. With so few color choices, it should not have been hard to get this right. Corvette owners are some of the most anal-retentive in the world and everything is documented! The 1956 and 1957 Corvettes were painted a shade closer to what the model photos show but the entire car was redesigned so the model isn't one of those either.

The 1955 yellow was actually closer to the yellow they show for the interior and the 1955 copper is more coppery. Many yellow 1955s were restored with a black interior. I believe this is incorrect.
Image
Last edited by Baxter on Sat Apr 25, 2015 1:50 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Baxter
Posts: 601
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:05 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Baxter » Sat Apr 25, 2015 12:51 am

A rundown of the colors of new Neo releases. I am only reviewing the hues used in the main portions of the models. I generally haven't researched whether any two-tone schemes are distributed accurately nor have I looked at interiors, wheel covers or trim variations between various models in that year's line.

1991 Buick Park Avenue (dark green) - Surprisingly, there were no green Buicks in 1991. This is a 1992 color. I would wait for another color. There were five shades of dark red this year and two greenish/slate blues as well as a nice navy blue. http://s1091.photobucket.com/user/aybcs ... s.jpg.html

1956 Lincoln (red & white) - The colors are correct. The white roof is correct and I know of no other two-tone layouts for this car. 1950s Lincolns weren't as attractive as their Cadillac & Chrysler counterparts and I'm not thrilled about this model.

1960 Ford Thunderbird (red) - this one looks accurate.

1957 Cadillac 62 (turquoise) - also appears accurate.

Marcellix
Posts: 1185
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 9:37 am
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Marcellix » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:27 am

Don't get me started on Neo flaws... Quality seems to be improving, but especially older models have sometimes awkward proportions. But it didn't stop me from having over a 100 Neo's in my collection.

AdamYip
Posts: 712
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 6:02 am

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by AdamYip » Wed Sep 09, 2015 2:15 am

Baxter wrote:A rundown of the colors of new Neo releases. I am only reviewing the hues used in the main portions of the models. I generally haven't researched whether any two-tone schemes are distributed accurately nor have I looked at interiors, wheel covers or trim variations between various models in that year's line.

1991 Buick Park Avenue (dark green) - Surprisingly, there were no green Buicks in 1991. This is a 1992 color. I would wait for another color. There were five shades of dark red this year and two greenish/slate blues as well as a nice navy blue. http://s1091.photobucket.com/user/aybcs ... s.jpg.html

1956 Lincoln (red & white) - The colors are correct. The white roof is correct and I know of no other two-tone layouts for this car. 1950s Lincolns weren't as attractive as their Cadillac & Chrysler counterparts and I'm not thrilled about this model.

1960 Ford Thunderbird (red) - this one looks accurate.

1957 Cadillac 62 (turquoise) - also appears accurate.
From the front grille (with "Buick" written across) and the steering wheel, that Park Avenue should be a 1995 or 1996. Its definitely not a 1991. So the emerald green colour should be accurate.

Cheers,
Adam

User avatar
IFHP
Posts: 1076
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:25 am
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by IFHP » Fri Sep 25, 2015 1:29 am

1956 Lincoln (red & white) - The colors are correct. The white roof is correct and I know of no other two-tone layouts for this car. 1950s Lincolns weren't as attractive as their Cadillac & Chrysler counterparts and I'm not thrilled about this model.
There was a unique to 1956 Lincoln offered a lavender color. I'm holding out in hopes that they re-issue in that color.
Collector of 1:43 Scale Fords

ImageHighway Scene by Michael, on Flickr

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest